Can't I ask Cursor or Claude to test the app for me?

You can, and you should. Agents can click through an app now, but the agent that wrote the code also decides what to test and whether the result is acceptable. It tends to test the paths it built and miss the ones it never thought of, like a declined card or a total that's wrong. An audit is an independent check by a QA team that didn't build it, on real devices, with every finding reproduced by hand.

How is this different from Momentic or Playwright?

Those are tools. Your team writes the tests, fixes them when they break, and reads the results. ConductorQA is a service. You send a URL and get back a report that our QA team has already checked.

Who does the testing?

A team of more than 25 engineers who work only on QA, led by senior engineers with 8 to 20 years of experience each. We use AI-assisted tooling to cover every route, but every finding in your report was reproduced by a person on a real device. If a finding can't be reproduced, it doesn't go in your report.

What do I need to send?

The app's URL (staging or production) and a short description of what it does. After we confirm scope, we ask for a test account by email. Don't send credentials for real customer accounts.

What kinds of apps do you test?

Web apps that run in a browser: SaaS dashboards, online stores, marketplaces, customer portals, and internal tools. We don't test native iOS or Android apps.

We have engineers but no QA engineer. Is this for us?

Yes. That's who ConductorQA is for, from a founder with one app to a product team of 50 engineers. Most teams start with an audit to find what's broken now. Teams that ship every week then move to monthly coverage, so every deploy is tested.

What does monthly coverage include?

We build and maintain an end-to-end test suite for the flows you agree on, run it on every deploy, and check every failure before it reaches you. It starts at $1,000 a month, depending on the number of flows and how often you deploy. You can cancel with 30 days' notice.

We're an agency. Can we resell the audit to our clients?

Yes. We can deliver the report under your agency's name and logo, so your client sees your brand. Tell us when you request the audit, and ask about agency rates if you have repeat projects.

Can you re-test after we fix the bugs?

Yes, for $250 within 30 days of your report. We rerun every flow that failed and tell you which fixes work.

When does the 48 hours start?

When we confirm scope, we give you a start slot. The 48 hours begin at that slot, once we can sign in to your app. Most teams have the report within three business days of sending the request.

Your AI can test your app. It shouldn't be the one to sign off on it.

Independent QA for software teams and agencies that ship with AI. We test every route on real phones and desktop, and a senior engineer who didn't write your code reproduces each bug by hand.

Request an audit See a sample report

Audits from $750, fixed price, with the report within 48 hours of your start slot. Monthly coverage from $1,000.

Example finding, written to show the report format Checkout · iPhone 17, Safari 26

Routes: 14
P0: 3
P1 and P2: 8
Passed: 31

P0 blocker

Checkout goes blank when you clear the promo code and tap Apply

Steps

On an iPhone with Safari, open /checkout with any plan in the cart.
Type LAUNCH20 in Promo code, then delete it.
Tap Apply.

The page goes blank. Console: TypeError: null is not an object (evaluating 'promo.trim')

Why it matters

Anyone who changes their mind about a code can't pay. Reloading empties the cart.

Suggested fix

Treat an empty field as no code: (promo ?? "").trim(). Disable Apply while the field is empty.

Reproduced by hand on iOS 26.
Screen recording and console log attached.

Read the full sample report

Your team ships faster with AI. Checking it still takes people who didn't build it.

With Cursor, Claude Code, and other coding agents, a team of five ships what used to take fifty. The apps break in the same places: error states nobody designed, layouts that fall apart on a phone, payment edge cases, and pages a user shouldn't be able to see.

Your coding agent Tests the code it wrote

> Test the invoice payment flow before we ship.

Ran the payment flow end to end.

Open the payment link for INV-1042
Pay with test card 4242 4242 4242 4242
Invoice status changes to Paid
Receipt email sent to the client

All 4 checks passed. Payments are ready to ship.

ConductorQA, same flow Tested by people who didn't write it

The account owner's invoice list after the client's card was declined
Invoice	Client	Amount	Status
INV-1041	Harbor Studio	$1,200.00	Paid
INV-1042	Northwind Labs	$860.00	Paid
INV-1043	Ellis & Park	$2,450.00	Unpaid

INV-1042 shows Paid, but the client's card was declined.

P0 blocker

A declined card still marks the invoice as paid

Paid with the decline test card 4000 0000 0000 0002, then opened the owner's invoice list. Reproduced by hand 3 of 3 times.

The agent tested the card it expected to work. We also tried the card that gets declined. Example written to show the difference, from our sample report.

Asking your coding agent to test its own work: Agents can click through an app now, but the agent that wrote the bug also decides what to test and whether it passed. It tests the paths it built, not the declined card or the total that's wrong, and it doesn't run on a real iPhone.
Developers testing their own work: The engineer who built the feature checks it on the laptop they built it on. They test the path they meant to build, not the one a customer takes on a phone. Most customers don't report bugs. They leave.
Hiring a QA engineer: A QA hire takes months to find and costs a full salary. Managed QA at around $8,000 a month is built for larger teams, and hourly testers need test plans and daily direction from you.

A QA team tests it. A senior engineer signs off.

Here's what happens between sending the URL and getting the report.

Step 1
You send the URL

Your staging or production URL and a few lines on what the app does. We reply within one business day to confirm scope, give you a start slot, and ask for a test account.
14 routes found
- /signup ✓
- /checkout ✓
- /invoices/:id/pay ✓
and 11 more
Step 2
We map the app

The team walks every reachable route and form, with AI-assisted crawling to make sure nothing is missed, and confirms which flows are in scope.
Step 3
We test each flow

Valid and invalid input, double submits, expired sessions, and two screen sizes. Every failure is captured with a screenshot or recording and the console and network logs.
- Declined card marked Paid 3 of 3
- Blank checkout on iPhone 5 of 5
- Same bug, other route Duplicate
- Slow load, once 0 of 3
Step 4
A senior engineer checks every finding

Each finding is reproduced by hand. Duplicates and anything that doesn't reproduce are dropped, and severity is set by what the bug would cost you.
Step 5
You get the report

A web page and a PDF, within 48 hours of your start slot. Every bug has steps, evidence, and a severity, followed by a fix order and a list of what passed.

What every audit checks

Both packages cover the same ground. The difference is how many routes we test.

User flows: Signup, onboarding, search, settings, and every other path a user can reach.
Forms: Empty fields, very long input, special characters, and double submits.
Sign-in and permissions: Login, password reset, magic links, expired sessions, and what each role can see.
Phone and desktop layouts: iOS Safari, Android Chrome, and desktop browsers. Overflow, tap targets, and elements that disappear.
Payments in test mode: Test cards, declined payments, webhooks, and receipt emails, using your gateway's test mode.
Errors and broken links: Uncaught JavaScript errors, failed API calls, and links that go nowhere.
Basic accessibility: Color contrast, missing alt text, and keyboard focus.

Not included: Load testing, penetration testing, native iOS and Android apps, and code changes.

ConductorQA compared with what you'd do instead

Teams without a QA engineer usually ask their coding agent, hire, or buy a tool. Here's how ConductorQA compares with each.

Comparison	ConductorQA	Your own coding agent	Hire a QA engineer	Testing tools	Hourly testers
What you get	A verified bug report with a fix order	A chat transcript saying it looks fine	One person's time, once they start	Software your team runs	Hours of manual testing
Who checks the result	A QA team that didn't write the code	The model that wrote the code	Your new hire	Whoever maintains the tests	The tester who filed it
Real phones and browsers	iOS Safari, Android Chrome, desktop	No	The devices you buy them	If you configure them	Varies
Price	$750 or $1,500 per audit, or monthly from $1,000	Free	A full-time salary	Subscription plus your team's time	$15 to $35 per hour
What you set up	A URL and a test account	Prompts, and reading the output	Hiring, onboarding, and management	Writing and maintaining tests	Test plans and daily direction
Turnaround	48 hours from your start slot	Minutes	Months to hire	Depends on your team	Varies

Managed QA services such as QA Wolf serve larger teams, with plans from about $8,000 a month as of October 2026. Prices come from public sources and may change.

For agencies: QA under your brand

Your team builds the client project. We test it before handoff, and you deliver the report as your own.

Deliver the report under your agency's name and logo. Your client sees your brand, and we stay in the background. Available on every package. Ask about agency rates for repeat projects.

Request a white-label audit

Who tests your app

More than 25 engineers dedicated to QA, led by senior engineers with 8 to 20 years each in QA and software architecture. One of them signs off on every report.

Kris

Co-founder and Senior Software Architect

Co-founder of ConductorQA and a software architect with more than 20 years of experience building and reviewing web applications.
Arun

QA Lead

QA lead with 16 years of experience in test strategy, acceptance testing, and accessibility.
RamaSwamy

Senior QA Engineer

Senior QA engineer with more than 10 years of experience in functional, cross-browser, and payment testing.
Bhavana

QA Engineer

QA engineer with more than 8 years of experience running release testing for SaaS and e-commerce teams.

More about how we work

Start with an audit. Keep us on every release.

You pay for results, not hours. Audits are fixed price, and above 40 routes we quote before we start. Monthly coverage is priced by the flows we test and how often you deploy.

Starter audit

Up to 15 routes. An MVP, a landing flow with signup and payment, or one big feature.

$750 one-time

Every reachable user flow, form, and sign-in path
Payments in test mode
Phone and desktop layouts
Console errors, failed requests, and broken links
Basic accessibility checks
Every finding reproduced by a senior engineer
Report with steps, severity, and a screenshot or recording per bug

Request a starter audit

Growth audit

Up to 40 routes. A full SaaS app, a store, or a client project before handoff.

$1,500 one-time

Every reachable user flow, form, and sign-in path
Payments in test mode
Phone and desktop layouts
Console errors, failed requests, and broken links
Basic accessibility checks
Every finding reproduced by a senior engineer
Report with steps, severity, and a screenshot or recording per bug
30-minute call to walk through the report

Request a growth audit

Monthly QA coverage

Software teams that ship every week and don't have a QA engineer.

From $1,000

per month, set by the number of flows and how often you deploy

An end-to-end test suite that we build, own, and maintain
A run on every deploy to staging or production
Every failure checked by a person before it reaches you
The flows agreed at onboarding, expanded each month
Billed monthly in advance, cancel with 30 days' notice

Ask about monthly coverage

See full pricing and the re-test add-on

Questions

Can't I ask Cursor or Claude to test the app for me?: You can, and you should. Agents can click through an app now, but the agent that wrote the code also decides what to test and whether the result is acceptable. It tends to test the paths it built and miss the ones it never thought of, like a declined card or a total that's wrong. An audit is an independent check by a QA team that didn't build it, on real devices, with every finding reproduced by hand.
How is this different from Momentic or Playwright?: Those are tools. Your team writes the tests, fixes them when they break, and reads the results. ConductorQA is a service. You send a URL and get back a report that our QA team has already checked.
Who does the testing?: A team of more than 25 engineers who work only on QA, led by senior engineers with 8 to 20 years of experience each. We use AI-assisted tooling to cover every route, but every finding in your report was reproduced by a person on a real device. If a finding can't be reproduced, it doesn't go in your report.
What do I need to send?: The app's URL (staging or production) and a short description of what it does. After we confirm scope, we ask for a test account by email. Don't send credentials for real customer accounts.
What kinds of apps do you test?: Web apps that run in a browser: SaaS dashboards, online stores, marketplaces, customer portals, and internal tools. We don't test native iOS or Android apps.
We have engineers but no QA engineer. Is this for us?: Yes. That's who ConductorQA is for, from a founder with one app to a product team of 50 engineers. Most teams start with an audit to find what's broken now. Teams that ship every week then move to monthly coverage, so every deploy is tested.
What does monthly coverage include?: We build and maintain an end-to-end test suite for the flows you agree on, run it on every deploy, and check every failure before it reaches you. It starts at $1,000 a month, depending on the number of flows and how often you deploy. You can cancel with 30 days' notice.
We're an agency. Can we resell the audit to our clients?: Yes. We can deliver the report under your agency's name and logo, so your client sees your brand. Tell us when you request the audit, and ask about agency rates if you have repeat projects.
Can you re-test after we fix the bugs?: Yes, for $250 within 30 days of your report. We rerun every flow that failed and tell you which fixes work.
When does the 48 hours start?: When we confirm scope, we give you a start slot. The 48 hours begin at that slot, once we can sign in to your app. Most teams have the report within three business days of sending the request.

Shipping soon? Send the URL today.

We reply within one business day to confirm scope and give you a start slot. The report arrives within 48 hours of that slot.

Request an audit Download free QA templates